Twelve Angry Men
Twelve Angry Men has much to
recommend it for. Cast, staging, cinematography and story. Cinema and theater
in one.
Twelve people in a room to
decide a capital murder case. One man stands against twelve. The enduring
greatness of the movie, of course, is that there is nothing false about the
movie. The story is still played out today. It was just played out this week in
a similar way when one juror stood up against eleven others against the death
penalty here in chicago. It must not have been a tea party.
This first clip of the old man
has various shades and colors of shame and humiliation. The old man is wise and
is given his chance to speak. What is always striking to me about this type of
truth is how one, obvious it is and two, of course, how immediately it is shot
down.
Now is this complicated and
fascinating but oh so common and mundane in all our common conversations.
Between lies so much!
First of all the juror that is
interrupting obviously has missed the whole point of what the old man has said.
Second the old man is caught
of guard and we wish he could address the interruption in some solid way but he
retorts in a similar fashion stating that the witness convinced himself that he
saw what he saw. To this the interrupting juror harshly and humiliating says
that he has never heard anything so fantastic. Note then the shame response in
the old man (his head goes down and the eyes are averted) and he is silent.